The due diligence letter is the last step between a dormant account and the state. It is the bank's final attempt to reach the owner before reporting, and it does two jobs at once. It gives the customer a chance to keep the account, and it creates the evidence the bank needs if a state auditor or a returning customer later asks whether the bank tried.
Most states require some form of owner notice before a holder reports unclaimed property, but they differ on almost every parameter: the window, the minimum value, the delivery method, the wording and whether a second notice or publication is required. This post explains the common structure, uses the model act and two state examples to show how the details vary, and covers how to assemble and document a notice program that holds up.
It reduces what you report. A meaningful share of owners respond to a well-timed letter, and every response is an account the bank keeps rather than sends to the state.
It is evidence. Under the Revised Uniform Unclaimed Property Act, the 2016 model act from the Uniform Law Commission, the holder's report must state that the holder complied with the notice requirements. A state's audit file will look for proof.
It supports the bank's protection after remittance. The 2016 model act relieves a holder that pays or delivers property in good faith, and substantially complies with the notice provisions, of liability arising afterward, and requires the state to defend and indemnify that holder against claims resulting from the remittance. A bank that skipped the notice may be in a weaker position when a customer claims it should not have reported the account.
The 2016 model act requires the holder to send notice by first-class U.S. mail not more than 180 days nor less than 60 days before filing the report, if:
If the owner has consented to receive email from the holder, the notice must go by both first-class mail and email, unless the holder believes the email address is invalid. The commentary notes that this extended the outer window from the 120 days used in earlier model acts.
Two published state examples show how much the details move:
The lesson is not the specific dates. It is that the notice calendar has to be built state by state from each administrator's current guidance, because two states can require opposite timing in the same month.
Work backward from each state's report date:
Put the dates on the compliance calendar, alongside the other annual items on the year-end bank compliance checklist.
The 2016 model act requires the notice to carry a heading substantially as follows: "Notice. The State of [state] requires us to notify you that your property may be transferred to the custody of the [administrator] if you do not contact us before [a date 30 days after the date of the notice]." It must also:
States may prescribe their own wording, require a form, ask the owner to return a signed statement, or set a response deadline. New York's reference sheet, for example, tells banks to request a signed written statement from the owner acknowledging the property's existence. Use the state's exact wording when it prescribes one, and keep a version of the letter for each state.
The following is a structure, not a substitute for any state's prescribed text. Fill each element from the state's requirements.
Keep the letter short and avoid language that reads like a collection notice. The customer should understand in the first two lines that they have money at the bank and what to do to keep it there.
Where the bank holds several reportable items for the same owner, one letter covering all of them is easier for the customer and reduces mailing cost. New York's guidance encourages this where feasible. Where an item has several owners at different addresses, New York requires a notice to each owner. That is a sensible default elsewhere unless the state says otherwise.
A response turns a reportable item back into an active account, but only if it is handled correctly.
Watch for claims that do not fit. A caller who knows the account number but cannot pass identification, or a request to send funds somewhere other than the owner, should be treated as a possible fraud attempt. Our post on elder financial exploitation covers related warning signs, since many dormant account owners are older customers.
The notice is only as good as the evidence that it went out on time to the right address with the right content. Keep, for each cycle and each state:
Retention matters because unclaimed property audits look back over many years. The 2016 model act requires holders to keep records for ten years after the later of the date a report was filed or the last date a timely report was due, unless the state sets a shorter period by rule, and limits state enforcement actions to within ten years after the duty arose.
The NAUPA III electronic reporting format also asks for the date that statutorily required owner notification was first performed, and the dates of any supplemental notifications, at the property level. A bank that cannot produce those dates per item will struggle to complete the file.
Due diligence mailings are usually run by deposit operations with support from compliance, and they depend on accurate account data and responsive branches. The Certificate in Deposit Compliance is aimed at staff who own deposit-side compliance, and the deposit compliance training and account management pages list related courses.
Before your next cycle, lay each state's notice window, threshold and wording requirement next to the template and calendar you used last year, and fix any gap before letters go out. For compliance staff who own that work, the Certificate in Deposit Compliance provides the broader deposit compliance foundation.
It is the notice a holder, such as a bank, sends to the owner of property that is about to be reported to a state as unclaimed. It tells the owner the property will be transferred to the state unless they respond, and explains how to keep it. Most states require it before reporting, within a defined window and above a minimum value. The letter also serves as the bank's evidence that it attempted to reach the owner.
Each state sets its own window, measured back from its report date. The 2016 model act requires first-class mail notice not more than 180 days nor less than 60 days before the report is filed. New York requires a first-class notice at least 90 days before the report and a certified notice at least 60 days before for items over $1,000. Texas requires notice no later than 60 days before its July 1 deadline.
Under the 2016 model act, the notice must carry a heading stating that the state requires the holder to notify the owner that the property may be transferred to the state if the owner does not respond by a date 30 days after the notice. It must describe the property and its value, explain that it will be turned over, that the owner must then claim it from the state, and how to prevent the transfer. States may prescribe their own wording.
Usually yes, but the amount is set by each state. The 2016 model act requires notice for property worth $50 or more, with the figure bracketed so states can choose. Some states also require a second notice by certified mail above a higher value, such as New York's requirement for items over $1,000. Items below the threshold may still need to be reported, often in the aggregate.
In some states. The 2016 model act requires first-class mail and, where the owner has consented to electronic delivery, email in addition. Texas allows notices by mail or email. Other states require mail only. Check each state's rule, and record the email address used and the transmission evidence if you rely on electronic notice.
If the owner responds before the deadline in a way the state recognizes, the bank removes the item from the report and treats the account as active again, updating its last owner-generated activity date. The bank should verify the responder's identity and signature, record the contact and update the address if needed. If the owner responds after the property has been remitted, they must claim it from the state.

